![[Rotten in Delaware]](http://www.rottenindelaware.com/wp-content/themes/custom/rottenlogo2.jpg)
Can Delaware Afford Strine’s Bad Judgement?
What Strine likes to call his public service career has largely been a career of public
self-promotion. In April of 2012, a Canadian author, Lord Conrad Black, warned that
Strine is a “seriously irritating and dangerous Delaware corporate and commercial judge”
who is “seeking attention and trying to become a celebrity.”2 Lord Black accurately
depicted Strine’s pursuit of public attention as both unusual for a judge and shameless.
Entire article here (PDF reader software required):
Can Delaware Afford Strine’s Bad Judgment?
Supporting Documents:
Chancellor Strine’s Ego
In the opinion of the author, Chancellor Strine has an over-sized ego that is a destabilizing force in the Delaware judiciary and threatens the flow of revenue from Delaware’s lucrative incorporation business. This article expands upon and provides support for that opinion.
Entire article here (PDF reader software required):
Supporting documents:
Rotten In Delaware
Vice Chancellor Leo E. Strine, Jr. [Strine] of the Delaware Court of Chancery unethically behaved as a zealous and dishonest advocate for the criminally dishonest Louis Segal [Louis] in deciding the case of Sloan v. Segal. Strine whitewashed Louis’s false statements made under penalty of perjury and other crimes related to his wholesale looting of his demented, geriatric mother, Patricia R. Sloan [Patricia], of more than three million dollars in less than four years. Strine also dishonestly distorted evidence and intentionally ignored well-established law. Strine did not merely accept the testimony of Louis or the arguments of his attorney. Strine, acting on his own initiative, repeatedly distorted evidence in favor of Louis in order to justify the corrupt verdict he rendered in favor of Louis.
Entire article here (PDF reader software required):
Supporting documents: